Offshoring in the Retirement Industry: A Delicate Balance


w

Deciding whether to offshore work is not just a matter of cost saving; it’s about considering quality, innovation, speed, and cultural alignment.

 

Offshoring technology services has become increasingly prevalent among large and mid-sized recordkeeping companies. Top consulting firms offer extensive technology consulting both domestically and internationally and boast their offshoring capabilities across various technology services. This presents managers and product owners with critical decisions about whether and to what extent they should offshore tasks, sometimes driven not by choice but by corporate directives.However, these decisions are often complicated by the variable quality standards of offshore companies and their teams’ limited understanding of the nuanced financial systems they’re engaging with.So, does offshoring retirement technology initiatives automatically spell trouble? Not exactly. Drawing from extensive experience with offshore and onshore teams, we’ve identified situations where offshoring could be advantageous, and others might be counterproductive.

When Offshoring Could Work:

  1. For straightforward, non-specialized, and teachable tasks, such as unit testing for specific scenarios or job monitoring.
  • If the project can proceed without continuous management oversight, provided there are clear performance metrics.
  • For long-term initiatives (over three years), consider the time needed to cultivate and train the offshore team.
  • When the on-site team or consultants have prior successful experiences working with offshore teams.
  • For projects that are unaffected by high staff turnover rates.

When Offshoring May Be Ill-Advised:

  • For short-term projects (under a year) with tight deadlines and budget limitations, especially if requirements need clarification.
  • If the work demands deep domain knowledge, process expertise, and the flexibility to adjust to business growth and new plans.
  • This is for projects needing specialized technology skills and complex solution architecture with evolving requirements.
  • When projects require ongoing knowledge transfer, frequent changes in requirements, and strict governance.

 

w
w

Offshoring in retirement technology is a complex path to cost reduction. Building, managing, and training offshore teams to produce tangible results demands patience and often involves multiple training iterations. Typically, developing a proficient offshore team that truly grasps the business, its clients, and its technological trajectory can take two to three years. Given the rapid project turnaround times and the dynamic nature of the retirement industry today, the question arises: Is it worth the time, effort, and resources to pursue offshoring, with uncertain outcomes, instead of maintaining onshore operations? Recent trends suggest that the answer for many in the retirement industry is leaning toward maintaining onshore resources for better immediacy and control.

Navigating the complexities of offshoring within the retirement industry requires a nuanced understanding of the potential rewards and inherent risks. It’s clear that while offshoring can offer significant cost savings and access to a global talent pool, it also presents challenges related to quality control, cultural alignment, and the need for stringent management oversight. The decision to offshore, particularly in an industry as sensitive as retirement planning, should be considered a one-size-fits-all solution. Instead, it demands a strategic approach that weighs the long-term benefits against the immediate costs and potential quality implications.

The scenarios outlined previously underscore the importance of careful selection and management of offshoring projects. Projects that are well-defined, repetitive, and less impacted by high turnover rates may thrive offshore. Conversely, tasks that require specialized knowledge, frequent interaction, and adaptation to changing requirements are better kept closer to home. This balance between what to offshore and what to maintain onshore is critical in maintaining service quality and meeting the evolving needs of the retirement industry.

Ultimately, the move towards or away from offshoring in the retirement sector should be informed by a thorough analysis of an organization’s specific needs, capabilities, and strategic objectives. Given the rapid pace of change and the increasing demand for innovation and flexibility in retirement services, firms must remain agile, continuously reassessing their offshoring strategies to ensure they align with current and future business goals. As the industry evolves, so must the approaches we take towards leveraging global resources to deliver the highest quality service to those planning for their retirement.